![]() But then how do you decide when you need to separate yourself from someone versus try to help them deal with a difficult situation in a better way? Just because someone acts like a jerk it does not automatically make them a jerk. Does behaving like a jerk translate into someone actually being a jerk? No, I concluded. There was one in particular that I kept coming back to. It was a difficult situation.Īs I lay in bed last night wishing I could just fall asleep instead of dreading what was going to happen in the morning I found dozens of question swirling around my head. Sad for the individual being let go as well as the person tasked with doing the firing. I felt a sense of relief that my husband would no longer have to deal with this person who had made his work so much more frustrating, but I also felt sad. He did not even have to explain the “it” he was referring to I knew immediately that the “jerk” he works with was finally being fired. “It’s happening at 8:30 tomorrow morning” my husband told me without preamble when we called me on his way home from work last night. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 5 (2-3), 292–306. Culture, attribution and automaticity: a social cognitive neuroscience view. Are your findings ‘WEIRD’? Monitor on Psychology, 41 (5). Without universality of concepts, how are we to understand universal human nature?Īzar, B. The FAE becomes much more interesting if it is truly universal. Diversity across genders, races, and cultures is vital for any research study. It brings forth the importance of something often all too ignored in research: diversity. The WEIRD problem necessitates reflection on previously accepted psychological concepts. The concept of making errors in attribution might itself be incorrectly attributed to human nature rather than to WEIRD societies. ![]() It is quite possible that the FAE is not “fundamental” at all. ![]() Research using more diverse populations must be completed on the FAE to determine the effects of education, industrialization, wealth, and government structure on the concept. Western cultures tend to be more individualist, so on this front the FAE is WEIRD. Studies have shown the FAE is more common in individualist cultures than in collectivist cultures (Mason & Morris, 2010). This finding means that the majority of research is only applicable to around an eighth of the world population. ![]() Their findings could radically shift the world of research, as it was found that 80% research participants are WEIRD, while representing only 12% of the human population (Azar, 2010). The term “WEIRD” was originally used by Henrich and Heine, referring to Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic societies. We will come back to the question at hand, but first let’s get weird. Yet, is the FAE itself a biased misconception? If true, the relevance of the FAE cannot be questioned, as all research should strive to be as unbiased as possible. Psychologists have no doubt that both internal and external factors influence our decision making, but attributions tend to favor the internal, creating a correspondence bias. Ross noted that participants tend to attribute motivation to mostly internal factors, ignoring potential external factors. The term was coined in 1977 by Lee Ross to explain common misattributions (Ross, 1977). Every student of social psychology is at some point introduced to the fundamental attribution error (FAE).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |